Podcast Episodes

Before You Put ENM in the Bio, Make the Agreement at Home

July 8, 2026 · by theswingnation

SFW TSN featured image showing a cozy dating-app agreement conversation with pineapple-inspired brand accents.

Before You Put ENM in the Bio, Make the Agreement at Home

Hey there, pineapple people.

Dating apps have made the lifestyle more visible than ever. That is a good thing, mostly. When people can say "ENM," "open," "swinging," or "looking together" without whispering like they are confessing a crime, shame loses a little bit of power.

But visibility is not the same thing as readiness.

WIRED recently reported on Feeld's growing pains as a once-niche, sex-positive app becomes more mainstream. Feeld told WIRED that membership grew 368 percent from 2021 to 2025, and that "finding community" became its fastest-growing relationship mode among new users in late 2025 into early 2026. Pew Research has also shown that about half of adults under 30 said open marriages are acceptable in its 2023 survey. Translation: more people are curious, swiping, and running into lifestyle language before they fully know what it means.

That can be exciting. It can also be messy as hell if the couple behind the profile has not done the grown-up part first.

So before you put ENM in the bio, link your partner, upload the cute vacation picture, or write "we play together only," sit down at home and make the agreement. Not the sexy fantasy version. The real version.

A profile is a promise

Your profile is not just marketing. In the lifestyle, your profile tells people what kind of experience they are walking toward. If it says you are open, consensual, experienced, or looking for connection, people are going to assume there is an actual agreement behind those words.

That means both partners should know what is in the bio and be genuinely good with it.

Not "I guess."

Not "fine, whatever."

Not "I said yes because I did not want to kill the mood."

An ENM profile that one partner tolerates while quietly panicking is already flirting with a consent gap, and consent gaps do not get smaller when strangers start sending flirty messages.

The first question is simple: are we both excited enough to be visible here?

If the answer is no, slow down. You can still talk, explore, go to an event, listen, learn, and see how your bodies feel in the room. But do not use a public-facing profile to drag one partner across a line they have not chosen.

Decide what the profile is for

This sounds obvious until you are ten messages deep and realize one of you thought you were looking for friends, while the other thought you were looking for a play date.

Before the bio goes live, name the lane.

Are you looking for community? Flirty conversation? Couples for dinner first? Soft-swap connection? Full-swap possibilities? Separate dating? Event friends? Curiosity with no play expectation yet?

None of those answers are wrong. What gets people hurt is pretending they are all the same.

Dan energy here: make sure the words on the profile match the agreement at home.

Lacy energy: and make sure the agreement at home still feels good in your body, not just in your mouth.

If you write "open to anything," strangers may believe you. If you write "no drama," but have not talked about jealousy, privacy, safer sex, alcohol, messaging boundaries, or mismatched attraction, the drama is not gone. It is just waiting in the corner.

Make a messaging agreement before the messages arrive

Here is where a lot of couples get sideways.

One partner opens the app "just to look." Then there is a match. Then there is a DM. Then it gets flirty. Then somebody feels left out, and suddenly the problem is not the app. The problem is that nobody defined private communication.

Talk through it before you need it.

Who can message? Shared profile only, or can each partner chat separately? Do you read every message together? Do you need a check-in before moving from app chat to text? What counts as flirting versus planning? Are photos okay? Are disappearing messages a no?

That last one matters. Privacy is not the same as secrecy. Privacy says, "We protect people's names, faces, jobs, families, and comfort." Secrecy says, "I am hiding this because the agreement would not survive daylight."

Lifestyle people need privacy. Relationships need transparency. Healthy couples learn the difference.

Talk about the no before chasing the yes

The most important part of your agreement is not what you hope happens. It is what you will do when someone gets uncomfortable.

If one of you wants to pause, is that an automatic pause? If one partner is interested and the other is not, do you both pass? If a match pushes a boundary, who says no?

This is where lifestyle trust is built. Not in pretending nobody gets jealous. Trust is built when the room gets a little awkward and both people still choose each other.

Business Insider's February interview with Kinsey Institute researcher Justin Garcia made a point lifestyle couples already know: open relationships can work for some people, but they take effort and can magnify existing issues instead of fixing them. That is not a reason to panic. It is a reason to stop treating the app like the starting line.

The starting line is the couch conversation.

Keep the bio honest, warm, and human

Once you have the agreement, write like real people.

You do not need to sound like a resume. You do not need to list every act you have ever considered. And please, for the love of pineapples, do not write like you are ordering a person from a menu.

Try something more human:

"Lifestyle-curious couple who values chemistry, kindness, and clear communication. We like dinner first, no pressure, and people who understand that trust is part of the fun."

That tells people a lot. It says you are not ashamed, not reckless, and you understand that the people on the other side of the screen are people, not props.

Revisit the agreement after real experience

Your first version will not be perfect. That is normal.

After a week, a match, a date, an awkward message, or a really good conversation, check back in. What felt exciting? What felt weird? Did either of you feel rushed? Did the profile attract the kind of people you actually want to meet? Did the bio overpromise?

No shame. Adjust.

The lifestyle works best when couples stay honest enough to update the agreement before resentment starts writing it for them.

So yes, put ENM in the bio if it is true. Be visible if you both want that. Find your people. Build community. Let shame keep losing.

Just make the agreement first.

Because the app might help you meet someone. But the trust you bring into that conversation? That has to come from home.

Big love, and keep those pineapples flying.

Sources

  • WIRED: "Feeld Was a Dating App for the Freaks. Now Some People Call It 'Normie Hell'" (2026)
  • Pew Research Center: "Views of divorce and open marriages" (2023)
  • Business Insider: "More people want open relationships, but many don't last" (2026)

Discover more from The Swing Nation

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading